Perspectives on Science 11 (4):443-483 (2003)

Karen Detlefsen
University of Pennsylvania
Malebranche is both an occasionalist and an advocate of the preformationist theory of generation. One might expect this given that he is a mechanist: passive matter cannot be the source of its own motion and so requires God to move it (occasionalism); and such matter, moving according to a few simple laws of motion, could never fashion something as complex as a living being, and so organisms must be fashioned by God at Creation (preformationism). This expectation finds a challenge in Kant's depiction of the relation between causation and generation. According to Kant, preformation is the generation theory one would expect the advocate of the pre-established harmony to endorse, while the occasionalist would endorse a theory whereby God directly forms the organism upon every insemination. I make sense of Malebranche's position in light of Kant's suggestion by examining the relation Malebranche sees between science and metaphysics, the roles that he believes empirical investigations and final causes have in scientific practice and explanation, and the role of the supernatural in Malebranche's philosophy.
Keywords Malebranche, Nicholas  pre-existence  preformation  occasionalism  generation  teleology  scientific explanation
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1162/106361403773082261
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 70,214
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Critique of the Power of Judgment.Immanuel Kant - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Boyle’s Teleological Mechanism and the Myth of Immanent Teleology.Laurence Carlin - 2012 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 43 (1):54-63.
Malebranche on the Metaphysics and Epistemology of Particular Volitions.Julie Walsh & Eric Stencil - 2016 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 54 (2):227-255.
The Lost Liquid Cosmogony of Johannes Daniel Schlichting.Justin Begley - 2020 - Perspectives on Science 28 (5):571-609.
Kant’s Epigenesis: Specificity and Developmental Constraints.Boris Demarest - 2016 - History and Philosophy of the Life Sciences 39 (1):3.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Occasionalism and General Will in Malebranche.Steven M. Nadler - 1993 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 31 (1):31-47.
Malebranche’s Occasionalism: A Strategic Reinterpretation.Alan Baker - 2005 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 79 (2):251-272.
François Lamy, Occasionalism, and the Mind-Body Problem.Fred Ablondi - 2008 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 46 (4):pp. 619-629.
The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche.Steven Nadler (ed.) - 2000 - Cambridge University Press.
Causation, Intentionality, and the Case for Occasionalism.Walter Ott - 2008 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 90 (2):165-187.
Descartes and Malebranche on Thought, Sensation and the Nature of the Mind.Antonia Lolordo - 2005 - Journal of the History of Philosophy 43 (4):387-402.
Malebranche.Andrew Pyle - 2003 - Routledge.
Causality and Human Freedom in Malebranche.Fred Ablondi - 1996 - Philosophy and Theology 9 (3-4):321-331.


Added to PP index

Total views
88 ( #132,514 of 2,507,560 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #416,983 of 2,507,560 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes