Synthese 200 (2):1-29 (2022)
AbstractAlthough traditionally neglected, mathematical diagrams have recently begun to attract attention from philosophers of mathematics. By now, the literature includes several case studies investigating the role of diagrams both in discovery and justification. Certain preliminary questions have, however, been mostly bypassed. What are diagrams exactly? Are there different types of diagrams? In the scholarly literature, the term “mathematical diagram” is used in diverse ways. I propose a working definition that carves out the phenomena that are of most importance for a taxonomy of diagrams in the context of a practice-based philosophy of mathematics, privileging examples from contemporary mathematics. In doing so, I move away from vague, ordinary notions. I define mathematical diagrams as forming notational systems and as being geometric/topological representations or two-dimensional representations. I also examine the relationship between mathematical diagrams and spatiotemporal intuition. By proposing an explication of diagrams, I explain certain controversies in the existing literature. Moreover, I shed light on why mathematical diagrams are so effective in certain instances, and, at other times, dangerously misleading.
Similar books and articles
‘Chasing’ the diagram—the use of visualizations in algebraic reasoning.Silvia de Toffoli - 2017 - Review of Symbolic Logic 10 (1):158-186.
The role of diagrams in mathematical arguments.David Sherry - 2008 - Foundations of Science 14 (1-2):59-74.
Intuition and visualization in mathematical problem solving.Valeria Giardino - 2010 - Topoi 29 (1):29-39.
Wizualizacje w poznaniu matematycznym a kategoria intuicji przestrzennej.Michał Sochański - 2013 - Filozofia Nauki 21 (1).
Mathematical Reasoning with Diagrams: From Intuition to Automation.Mateja Jamnik - 2001 - Stanford Univ Center for the Study.
Survey on the Recent Studies of the Role of Diagrams in Mathematics from the Viewpoint of Philosophy of Mathematics.Hiroyuki Inaoka - 2014 - Kagaku Tetsugaku 47 (1):67-82.
Groundwork for a Fallibilist Account of Mathematics.Silvia De Toffoli - 2021 - Philosophical Quarterly 7 (4):823-844.
Proof: Its nature and significance.Michael Detlefsen - 2008 - In Bonnie Gold & Roger A. Simons (eds.), Proof and Other Dilemmas: Mathematics and Philosophy. Mathematical Association of America. pp. 1.
Diagrams and proofs in analysis.Jessica Carter - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):1 – 14.
Book Reviews: Claude P. Bruter (editor), Mathematics in Art: Mathematical Visualization in Art and Education.Walter Carnielli - 2004 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 13:163-166.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
The Shaping of Deduction in Greek Mathematics: A Study in Cognitive History.Reviel Netz - 1999 - Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
The Philosophy of Mathematical Practice.Paolo Mancosu (ed.) - 2008 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Mathematical Knowledge and the Interplay of Practices.José Ferreirós - 2015 - Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.