David Armstrong and perception

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (May):80-88 (1963)
Abstract
This Article does not have an abstract
Keywords Epistemology  Illusion  Justification  Knowledge  Observation  Perception  Physical Object  Scepticism  Armstrong, D  Deutscher, M
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00048406312341541
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,511
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
McDowell, Scepticism, and the 'Veil of Perception'.David Macarthur - 2003 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 81 (2):175-190.
Reply to Armstrong.John A. Foster - 2004 - Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):27-28.
In Defence of the Cognitivist Theory of Perception.David M. Armstrong - 2004 - Harvard Review of Philosophy 12 (1):19-26.
Armstrong and Perception.C. G. Prado - 1968 - Theoria 34 (3):256-258.
The Non-Sensuous Epistemic Account of Perception.J. Barry Maund - 1976 - American Philosophical Quarterly 13 (January):57-62.
Perceptual Knowledge.Georges Dicker - 1980 - Dordrecht: Reidel.
An Examination of D M Armstrong's Theory of Perception.John O. Nelson - 1964 - American Philosophical Quarterly 1 (April):154-160.
Max Deutscher and Perception.David M. Armstrong - 1963 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 41 (August):246-249.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
71 ( #75,435 of 2,180,712 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #301,383 of 2,180,712 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums