Southern Journal of Philosophy 44 (3):427-445 (2006)
Radical Millianism agrees with less radical varieties in claiming that ordinary proper names lack “descriptive senses” and that the semantic content of such a name is just its referent but differs from less radical varieties of Millianism in claiming that any pair of sentences differing only in the exchange of coreferential names cannot differ in truth-value. This is what makes Radical Millianism radical. The view is surprisingly popular these days, and it is popular despite the fact that, until very recently, there was not a single argument for it. Theodore Sider and David Braun (2006) have tried to provide the missing argument, but, I argue, their attempt fails. I conclude that we (still) have no reason to be Radical Millians.
|Keywords||Analytic Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Beyond Rigidity: The Unfinished Semantic Agenda of Naming and Necessity.Scott Soames - 2002 - Oxford University Press.
Naming and Necessity.Saul Kripke - 2010 - In Darragh Byrne & Max Kölbel (eds.), Philosophy. Routledge. pp. 431-433.
Direct Reference, Propositional Attitudes, and Semantic Content.Scott Soames - 1987 - Philosophical Topics 15 (1):47-87.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Current State of (Radical) Pragmatics in the Cognitive Sciences.Richard Breheny - 2002 - Mind and Language 17 (1&2):169–187.
Two Versions of Millianism.Scott Soames - 2014 - In Analytic Philosophy in America: And Other Historical and Contemporary Essays. Princeton University Press. pp. 231-264.
On the Concept of “Radical Understanding”.Gaetano Chiurazzi - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 2:7-12.
Added to index2010-09-14
Total downloads43 ( #115,455 of 2,143,908 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #120,706 of 2,143,908 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.