The myth of the metaphysical circle: An analysis of the contemporary crisis of the critique of metaphysics

Inquiry 51 (3):312 – 341 (2008)
Abstract
Examination of contemporary debates on metaphysics and its critique yields the conclusion that there is an overall tendency to defend an inextricable bond between them. According to the vast majority of participants in these debates, any reaction against metaphysics, however powerful or radical, is bound to remain trapped in the metaphysical tradition. The dominant view is that criticism either remains tied to or eventually returns to forms of metaphysics, if it does not in fact remain metaphysical in itself. This view confirms the persistence of a typical pattern, namely, that of a circular relationship between metaphysics and its critique. Conspicuous by its absence is the idea of a critique of metaphysics that is not caught up in this vicious metaphysical circle. Moreover, the alleged self-defeating and counterproductive character of critique has become so widely and uncritically accepted—even among opponents of metaphysics—that strong and well-founded objections to metaphysics have largely disappeared from philosophical discourse. Contrary to the conventional idea of a crisis of metaphysics, there appears to be a crisis of the critique of metaphysics. This paper attempts to turn the tide of this crisis. It demonstrates that the categorical assertion of a circular relationship between metaphysics and its critique cannot be logically justified. Furthermore, it presents three different forms of criticism that cannot be metaphysically recuperated. It therefore concludes that the wide acceptance of the idea of an inescapable metaphysical circle, instead of being inspired by sound and irrefutable arguments, is essentially based on a myth.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/00201740802120772
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 27,204
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
To Be Is to Be Determinate.D. W. Hadley - 2002 - International Philosophical Quarterly 42 (3):329-348.
The Essential Kant.Immanuel Kant - 1970 - New York: New American Library.
Explanation in Metaphysics?Johannes Persson - 2011 - Metaphysica 12 (2):165-181.
Hegelian Metaphysics.Robert Stern - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Collingwood and the Sea Anemone.Tim Lord - 2011 - Collingwood and British Idealism Studies 17 (1):117-134.
Kant's Metaphysics of the Self.Colin Marshall - 2010 - Philosophers' Imprint 10 (8):1-21.
Is There Metaphysics After Critique?William Desmond - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (2):221-241.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

49 ( #105,887 of 2,164,289 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,289 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums