Complexity, Relevance and Character: Problems with teaching the ad hominem fallacy

Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 (1):31-56 (2003)
Authors
Stephen De Wijze
University of Manchester
Abstract
No abstract
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/epat.2003.35.issue-1
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 43,780
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Political Liberalism.J. Rawls - 1995 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 57 (3):596-598.
A Practical Study of Argument.Trudy Govier - 1991 - Wadsworth Pub. Co..
The Logic of Real Arguments.Alec Fisher - 2004 - Cambridge Univeristy Press.
Introduction to Logic.Irving M. Copi - 1953 - Pearson/Prentice Hall.

View all 14 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Complexity, Relevance and Character: Problems with Teaching the Ad Hominem Fallacy.Stephen de Wijze - 2003 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 35 (1):31-56.
Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentum Ad Hominem. [REVIEW]Frans H. Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.
Relevance Reviewed: The Case of Argumentum Ad Hominem.Frans H. Van Eemeren & Rob Grootendorst - 1992 - Argumentation 6 (2):141-159.
Equivocating the Ad Hominem.Daniel Putman - 2010 - Philosophy 85 (4):551-555.
In Defence of Virtue: The Legitimacy of Agent-Based Argument Appraisal.Andrew Aberdein - 2014 - Informal Logic 34 (1):77-93.
Lightening Up on the Ad Hominem.John Woods - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):109-134.
Ad Hominem Fallacies, Bias, and Testimony.Audrey Yap - 2013 - Argumentation 27 (2):97-109.
The Five Forms of the Ad Hominem Fallacy.S. Morris Engel - 1994 - Inquiry: Critical Thinking Across the Disciplines 14 (1):19-36.
Three Potential Problems for Powers' One-Fallacy Theory.Matthew Zuckero - 2003 - Informal Logic 23 (3):285-292.
Reconsidering the Ad Hominem.Christopher M. Johnson - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (2):251-266.
Attacking Authority.Matthews Steve - 2011 - Australian Journal of Professional and Applied Ethics 13 (2):59-70.
Reconsidering the Ad Hominem: Christopher M. Johnson.Christopher M. Johnson - 2009 - Philosophy 84 (2):251-266.
The Ad Hominem Argument as an Informal Fallacy.Douglas N. Walton - 1987 - Argumentation 1 (3):317-331.
Poisoning the Well.Douglas Walton - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (3):273-307.
It's All Very Well for You to Talk! Situationally Disqualifying Ad Hominem Attacks.Erik C. W. Krabbe & Douglas Walton - 1993 - Informal Logic 15 (2).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
55 ( #150,128 of 2,265,036 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #362,355 of 2,265,036 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature


Home | New books and articles | Bibliographies | Philosophy journals | Discussions | Article Index | About PhilPapers | API | Contact us | Code of conduct

CDP Phiosophy Documentation Center
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications).

Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation

Page generated Thu Nov 14 09:32:33 2019 on pp1