Journal of Philosophy 24 (3):57-64 (1927)
I am not equipped with capacities which fit one for the office of a lexicographical autocrat, and I shall make no attempt to tell what naturalism must or should signify. But I may take advantage of the opportunity to say what empirical naturalism, or naturalistic empiricism, means to me. I can not hope to offer anything new, or anything which I have not said many times already. But perhaps by concentrating on this point I may make the tenor of my thinking clearer, and incidentally throw some light on why it appears, from two opposite ends of the philosophic gamut, to be half-hearted.
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Wieman's Misunderstanding of Dewey: The Christian Century Discussion.Marvin C. Shaw - 1987 - Zygon 22 (1):7-19.
Another Note on "the Metaphysical Development of John Dewey".Marcus Brown - 1958 - Educational Theory 8 (4):284-285.
Similar books and articles
Introduction - the Nature of Naturalism.David Macarthur & Mario De Caro - 2004 - In Naturalism in Question. Harvard University Press.
What is Empiricism?--, Nativism, Naturalism, and Evolutionary Theory.Cynthia Macdonald - 1990 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81:81-92.
Methodological Naturalism and Philosophical Naturalism.Barbara Forrest - 2000 - Philo 3 (2):7-29.
Religious Naturalism Today: The Rebirth of a Forgotten Alternative.Jerome Arthur Stone - 2008 - State University of New York Press.
Philosophical Naturalism at the Turn of the Century.Robert Audi - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:27-45.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads68 ( #76,193 of 2,158,385 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #355,511 of 2,158,385 )
How can I increase my downloads?