Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):214-227 (2004)
AbstractThis paper compares Aristotle’s and Aquinas’s accounts of the virtue of magnanimity specifically as a corrective to the vice of pusillanimity. After definingpusillanimity and underscoring key features of Aristotelian magnanimity, I explain how Aquinas’s account of Christian magnanimity, by making humandependence on God fundamental to this virtue, not only clarifies the differences between the vice of pusillanimity and the virtue of humility, but also showswhy only Christian magnanimity can free us from improper and damaging forms of dependence on the opinions and standards of others, enabling us toavoid the moral pitfalls of both pusillanimity and presumption
Similar books and articles
The Second-Person Perspective in Aquinas’s Ethics: Virtues and Gifts.Andrew Pinsent - 2011 - Routledge.
Aquinas on Natural Law and the Virtues in Biblical Context: Homosexuality as a Test Case.Eugene F. Rogers Jr - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):29 - 56.
Aquinas's Replication of the Acquired Moral Virtues: Rethinking the Standard Philosophical Interpretation of Moral Virtue in Aquinas.John Inglis - 1999 - Journal of Religious Ethics 27 (1):3 - 27.
Aquinas on the Function of Moral Virtue.Jeffrey Hause - 2007 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 81 (1):1-20.
Thomas Aquinas: Disputed Questions on the Virtues.Thomas Aquinas - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Albert the Great and Thomas Aquinas on Magnanimity.Tobias Hoffmann - 2008 - In István Pieter Bejczy (ed.), Virtue Ethics in the Middle Ages: Commentaries on Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics, 1200 -1500. Brill.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Mencius' Jun-Zi, Aristotle's Megalopsuchos, & Moral Demands to Help the Global Poor.Sean Walsh - 2013 - Comparative Philosophy 4 (1):103-129.
References found in this work
No references found.