Faith and Philosophy 21 (2):214-227 (2004)

Abstract
This paper compares Aristotle’s and Aquinas’s accounts of the virtue of magnanimity specifically as a corrective to the vice of pusillanimity. After definingpusillanimity and underscoring key features of Aristotelian magnanimity, I explain how Aquinas’s account of Christian magnanimity, by making humandependence on God fundamental to this virtue, not only clarifies the differences between the vice of pusillanimity and the virtue of humility, but also showswhy only Christian magnanimity can free us from improper and damaging forms of dependence on the opinions and standards of others, enabling us toavoid the moral pitfalls of both pusillanimity and presumption
Keywords Contemporary Philosophy  Philosophy and Religion  Virtue  Aquinas
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0739-7046
DOI 10.5840/faithphil20042125
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Roots of Despair.Rebecca Konyndyk DeYoung - 2015 - Res Philosophica 92 (4):829-854.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
159 ( #63,585 of 2,433,358 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
30 ( #26,292 of 2,433,358 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes