Resistance to the demands of love: Aquinas on the vice of Acedia

The Thomist 68 (2):173-204 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The list of the seven capital vices include sloth, envy, avarice, vainglory, gluttony, lust, and anger. While many of the seven vices are more complex than they appear at first glance, one stands out as more obscure and out of place than all the others, at least for a contemporary audience: the vice of sloth. Our puzzlement over sloth is heightened by sloth's inclusion on the traditional lists of the seven capital vices and the seven deadly sins from the fourth century onward. For hundreds of years, these seven vices were distinguished as moral and spiritual failings of serious and perennial importance. By contrast, recent studies, as well as the popular imagination, typically associate sloth with, or even define it as, laziness. But is laziness in fact a moral failing?

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Vice of In-Principlism and the Harmfulness of Love.John Danaher - 2013 - American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11):19-21.
Is it Better to Love Better Things?Aaron Smuts - 2015 - In Tony Milligan, Christian Maurer & Kamila Pacovská (eds.), Love and Its Objects.
Aquinas's Argument against Self-Hatred.Keith Green - 2007 - Journal of Religious Ethics 35 (1):113 - 139.
Envy and Self-worth.Timothy Perrine - 2011 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 85 (3):433-446.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
653 (#24,887)

6 months
136 (#23,803)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Rebecca DeYoung
Calvin University

Citations of this work

Holy Fear.Rebecca DeYoung - 2012 - American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 86 (1):1-22.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references