The Under— and Overestimation Effects in Comparative Judgments — Assimilation and Contrast Mechanisms

Polish Psychological Bulletin 39 (4):217-225 (2008)

The Under— and Overestimation Effects in Comparative Judgments — Assimilation and Contrast Mechanisms The aim of the studies presented in this paper was to propose a new explanation of under— and overestimation effects in comparative judgments. The fundamental assumption of this new interpretation is that in comparative judgments the target is contrasted with the comparison standard when the compared objects seem generally dissimilar and assimilated to the standard when the objects seem generally similar. In a series of three studies students were asked to compare the chances of certain events occurring to two objects. The direction of comparison was manipulated. Generally, when the more salient object was compared to the less salient object, irrespective of the valence of the events, the overestimation effects occurred only in case of frequent events and the underestimation effects only in case of rare events. The reversal of direction of comparisons yielded the clear reduction of comparative bias.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2478/v10059-008-0027-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,223
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Features of Similarity.Amos Tversky - 1977 - Psychological Review 84 (4):327-352.
Perceiving Persons and Groups.David L. Hamilton & Steven J. Sherman - 1996 - Psychological Review 103 (2):336-355.
Studies of Similarity.Amos Tversky & Itamar Gati - 1978 - In Eleanor Rosch & Barbara Lloyd (eds.), Cognition and Categorization. Lawrence Elbaum Associates. pp. 1--1978.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analysis of Contrast Effects in Loudness Judgments.Lawrence E. Melamed & Willard R. Thurlow - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 90 (2):268.
Contrast Effects in Judgments of Auditory Intensities.J. G. Needham - 1935 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 18 (2):214.
Serial Position Effects in Comparative Judgments.Ej Shoben - 1987 - Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 25 (5):331-331.
Proactive Effects of Interpolated Anchors.Hadyn D. Ellis - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 98 (2):233.
Three Orientation and Four 'Sins' in Comparative Studies.Bo Mou - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 7:141-147.
Psychophysical Scaling: Judgments of Attributes or Objects?Gregory R. Lockhead - 1992 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 15 (3):543-558.
On the Cognitive Bases of Knowledge Ascriptions.Mikkel Gerken - 2012 - In Jessica Brown & Mikkel Gerken (eds.), Knowledge Ascriptions. Oxford University Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
3 ( #1,216,854 of 2,285,692 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #575,397 of 2,285,692 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature