Journal of Economic Methodology 16 (2):191-206 (2009)
The puzzle: why do so many economists in principle acknowledge the importance of creative destruction, and yet in practice give so little attention to creative destruction in what they teach and what they research? The answer lies, in part, in the difficulty of obtaining what is viewed as ?hard? evidence in support of some of the central claims. For example, one such claim is that new products contribute more to consumer well-being than price competition on old products. The only kind of evidence accepted by much of the profession is the testing of econometric hypotheses generated from formal models. The sort of evidence found in persuasive sources such as DeLong's ?Cornucopia? consists of historical examples and raw time series. I argue that in the short run, a more pluralistic methodology would be better, and that in the long run, we should seek to understand which methods work best under which circumstances.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Scrutinizing Science: Empirical Studies of Scientific Change.Arthur Donovan, Larry Laudan, Rachel Laudan & John Preston - 1994 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 45 (4):1063-1065.
Scientific Change: Philosophical Models and Historical Research.Larry Laudan, Arthur Donovan, Rachel Laudan, Peter Barker, Harold Brown, Jarrett Leplin, Paul Thagard & Steve Wykstra - 1986 - Synthese 69 (2):141 - 223.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Constrained Belief and the Reactive Attitudes.Jonathan E. Adler - 1997 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 57 (4):891-905.
How Proper Names Refer.Imogen Dickie - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):43-78.
Introducing Events, Successful Reference and Reference-Fixing.Friedel Weinert - 1991 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 22 (1):155-167.
What Are the Moral Limits of Weapons Research?John Forge - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (1):76-87.
Change Blindness, Gibson, and the Sensorimotor Theory of Vision.Brian J. Scholl & Daniel J. Simons - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):1004-1006.
The Concept of Evidence in Evidence-Based Practice.Tone Kvernbekk - 2011 - Educational Theory 61 (5):515-532.
Action Research and Reflective Practice: Creative and Visual Methods to Facilitate Reflection and Learning.Paul McIntosh - 2010 - Routledge.
Evidence-Based Ethical Problem Solving: An Idea Whose Time has Come. [REVIEW]Joan E. E. Sieber - 2005 - Journal of Academic Ethics 3 (2-4):113-125.
Fixing the Reference of Theoretical Terms.Robert Nola - 1980 - Philosophy of Science 47 (4):505-531.
Means/Ends and the Nature of Engineering.Michael Hodges - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:456 - 463.
Elucidation, Meta-Philosophy, and Hacker's Use of “External Evidence”.Kevin M. Cahill - 2008 - Journal of Philosophical Research 33:73-99.
Beyond Anthropomorphism: Attributing Psychological Properties to Animals.Kristin Andrews - 2011 - In Tom L. Beauchamp R. G. Frey (ed.), Oxford Handbook of Animal Ethics. Oxford University Press. pp. 469--494.
Added to index2012-02-20
Total downloads16 ( #287,447 of 2,143,794 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #280,512 of 2,143,794 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.