Dissertation, Brown University (1987)

Authors
Abstract
Standard interpretations of Descartes' work, especially those inspired by analytic philosophy, assume the syllogism and Principia Mathematica's artificial language are appropriate tools for interpreting Cartesianism, particularly the ontological argument. The dissertation shows technical problems arise when those logics are used for that purpose. An intentianal interpretation along Meinongian lines is proposed, as an alternative to deductive exegeses. This interpretation is developed after arguing that Russell did not identify what I call "the epistemic use" of Meinong's theory of objects. The proposed interpretation is nonlogical in the sense that intentionality alone, not deductive arguments, explains the cogito and res cogitans' belief in god's existence. God is the only one of res cogitan's intentionalia in which existence is analytically included; thus, there is no need for an ontological argument. Such an interpretation is consistent with Descartes' rejection of syllogistics as a truth-discovering tool and provides a framework to evaluate Cartesianism and Kant's criticism of it. Moreover, some problems afflicting logico-deductive readings cannot arise in this interpretation
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Descartes on Representation, Ideas, and Sensations.Kurt Dwayne Smith - 1998 - Dissertation, The Claremont Graduate University
Descartes, the Cartesian Circle, and Epistemology Without God.Michael Della Rocca - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (1):1–33.
On the Justification of Deductive Logic.Zuo-li Wang - 2006 - Nankai University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 6:106-113.
Object, Work, and Interpretation.Peter Lamarque - 2005 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 12 (1):1-7.
Kant's Philosophical Revolution in the "Critique of Pure Reason".Diane Ralston Mayer - 1980 - Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder
Cartesian Analyticity.Jesús A. Díaz - 1988 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 26 (1):47-55.
Relativism and Interpretive Objectivity.Joseph Margolis - 2000 - Metaphilosophy 31 (1-2):200-226.
Descartes's Cogito Reexamined.Robert N. Beck - 1953 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 14 (2):212-220.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-02-04

Total views
45 ( #249,586 of 2,499,677 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
9 ( #80,254 of 2,499,677 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes