Argumentation 32 (2):301-307 (2018)

Authors
Marcello Di Bello
Arizona State University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s10503-016-9413-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Contemporary Theories of Knowledge.Hilary Kornblith - 1988 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 49 (1):167-171.
Dialectics: A Controversy-Oriented Approach to the Theory of Knowledge.John Kekes - 1979 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 39 (4):603-604.
Pragmatic and Idealized Models of Knowledge and Ignorance.Douglas Walton - 2005 - American Philosophical Quarterly 42 (1):59 - 69.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Argument Has No Function.Jean Goodwin - 2007 - Informal Logic 27 (1):69-90.
Legal Argumentation and Evidence.Douglas Walton - 2002 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
A Pragmatic Theory of Fallacy.Douglas Walton - 2003 - University Alabama Press.
The Place of Emotion in Argument.Douglas WALTON - 1992 - Pennsylvania State University Press.
Evaluating Corroborative Evidence.Douglas Walton & Chris Reed - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (4):531-553.
Slippery Slope Arguments.Douglas Walton - 1992 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-10-06

Total views
41 ( #254,193 of 2,433,548 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #217,362 of 2,433,548 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes