An earnest reply to professor Stalker

Philosophia 8 (4):713-718 (1979)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF02379061
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,520
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
I. Mathematical Modeling of Election Predictions: Final Reply to Professor Aubert.Herbert A. Simon - 1983 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):231 – 232.
Explaining Computer Behavior.James H. Moor - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (October):325-7.
Reply to Professor Brender and Professor Byrne.Phillip Cole - 2002 - Social Philosophy Today 18:197-206.
Why Machines Can't Think: A Reply to James Moor.Douglas F. Stalker - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 34 (3):317-20.
A Reply to Professor Margolis.Review author[S.]: George Dickie - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):229-231.
Review: A Reply to Professor Margolis. [REVIEW]George Dickie - 1975 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 34 (2):229 - 231.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
8 ( #498,678 of 2,180,800 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #300,627 of 2,180,800 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums