Divine Hiddenness and the Suffering Unbeliever Argument

In this essay, I propose two arguments from Thomas Aquinas’s reflection on theism and faith to rebut Schellenberg’s claim that divine hiddenness justifies atheism. One of those arguments, however, may be employed so as to re-propose Schellenberg’s conviction, which is crucial to his argument, that there are ‘non-resistant’ or ‘inculpable’ unbelievers. I then advance what I call the suffering unbeliever argument. In short, the unbelievers mentioned by Schellenberg are expected to suffer because of their non-belief, which—as Schellenberg says—prevents them from achieving the greatest possible well-being. If they suffer, however, they cannot consider themselves unbelievers, since one cannot suffer from not having been given a certain good if one believes that the good in question has never existed. If they do not suffer, on the other hand, there is simply nothing for which they can consider themselves inculpable.
Keywords Schellenberg, Aquinas, evidence, non-resistant unbelievers, faith
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.24204/ejpr.v0i0.2956
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 47,299
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Summa Theologica.Thomas Aquinas - 1274 - Hayes Barton Press.
Providence and the Problem of Evil.John Hick - 1998 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 47 (1):57-61.
Divine Openness and Creaturely Non-Resistant Non-Belief.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2016 - In Adam Green & Eleonore Stump (eds.), Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief: New Perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
What is the Problem of the Hiddenness of God?Peter Van Inwagen - 2002 - In Daniel Howard-Snyder & Paul K. Moser (eds.), Divine Hiddenness: New Essays. Cambridge University Press.

View all 20 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Divine Hiddenness and Belief de Re.Benjamin S. Cordry - 2009 - Religious Studies 45 (1):1-19.
Some Critical Reflections on the Hiddenness Argument.Imran Aijaz & Markus Weidler - 2007 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 61 (1):1 - 23.
Wagering Against Divine Hiddenness.Elizabeth Jackson - 2016 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 8 (4):85-108.
Divine Hiddenness and the Concept of God.Roberto Di Ceglie - 2019 - International Philosophical Quarterly 59 (4):397-409.
Hiddenness and Transcendence.Michael C. Rea - 2016 - In Adam Green & Eleanore Stump (eds.), Hidden Divinity and Religious Belief. Cambridge University Press. pp. 210-225.
Divine Hiddenness and the Nature of Belief.Ted Poston & Trent Dougherty - 2007 - Religious Studies 43 (2):183 - 198.
Divine Love and the Argument From Divine Hiddenness.Ebrahim Azadegan - 2014 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 6 (2):101--116.


Added to PP index

Total views
10 ( #782,084 of 2,290,952 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #85,082 of 2,290,952 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature