While the contemporary biomimicry movement is associated primarily with the idea of taking Nature as model for technological innovation, it also contains a normative or ethical principle—Nature as measure—that may be treated in relative isolation from the better known principle of Nature as model. Drawing on discussions of the principle of Nature as measure put forward by Benyus and Jackson, while at the same time situating these discussions in relation to contemporary debates in the philosophy of biomimicry : 364–387, 2011; Dicks in Philos Technol, doi: 10.1007/s13347-015-0210-2, 2015; Blok and Gremmen in J Agric Environ Ethics 29:203–217, 2016), the aim of this paper is to explore the relation between the principle of Nature as measure and environmental ethics. This leads to the argument that mainstream formulations of environmental ethics share the common trait of seeing our ethical relation to Nature as primarily involving duties to protect, preserve, or conserve various values in Nature, and that, in doing so, they problematically either overlook or dismiss as anthropocentric the possibility that Nature may provide measures, understood in terms of ecological standards, against which our own practices, or at least some of them, may be judged—a way of thinking I call “biomimetic ethics”. The practical consequences of this argument are significant. Whereas mainstream environmental ethics has been applied above all to such issues as wilderness preservation, natural resource management, and animal rights and welfare, biomimetic ethics is applicable rather to the question of how we produce, use, and consume things, and, as such, may potentially provide the basic ethical framework required to underpin the transition to a circular, bio-based, solar economy.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10806-017-9667-6
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 65,636
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2009 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Noûs. Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan & Mary Midgley - 1986 - The Personalist Forum 2 (1):67-71.
The Philosophy of Biomimicry.Henry Dicks - 2016 - Philosophy and Technology 29 (3):223-243.

View all 33 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Ethics of Being Part of Nature.Tom Colwell - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (2):99-113.
The Ethics of Being Part of Nature.Tom Colwell - 1987 - Environmental Ethics 9 (2):99-113.
The Value of Wildness.Kenneth H. Simonsen - 1981 - Environmental Ethics 3 (3):259-263.
Environmental Ethics From the Japanese Perspective.Midori Kagawa-Fox - 2010 - Ethics, Place and Environment 13 (1):57 – 73.
Nature and Culture In Environmental Ethics.Iii Holmes Rolston - 1999 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 1:151-158.
There is No Such Thing as Environmental Ethics.Professor P. Aarne Vesilind - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3):307-318.
There is No Such Thing as Environmental Ethics.P. Aarne Vesilind - 1996 - Science and Engineering Ethics 2 (3):307-318.
Rational Nature as the Source of Value.Alison Hills - 2005 - Kantian Review 10:60-81.


Added to PP index

Total views
27 ( #411,416 of 2,462,264 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #299,023 of 2,462,264 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes