The Monist 57 (2):191-219 (1973)

Authors
Georges Dicker
State University of New York (SUNY)
Abstract
Anyone familiar with some of Dewey’s major works knows that they are highly critical of nearly all that has traditionally passed under the name of “epistemology” or “theory of knowledge”. Even a casual reading of a few chapters of Reconstruction in Philosophy, The Quest for Certainty or Experience and Nature reveals Dewey’s iconoclasm toward “that species of confirmed intellectual lock-jaw called epistemology”. The source of this attitude is Dewey’s belief that all theories of knowledge previous to his own are based upon an unexamined and mistaken conception of knowing. This is that knowing is a relation between a knower and a thing known, in which the knower is essentially a viewer or passive spectator of the thing known. Knowing is conceived on the analogy of seeing an object; it is, as Dewey says, “modeled on what [is] supposed to take place in the act of vision”. For Dewey, it is not a matter of consequence how the two members of the knowledge-relation are described. Whether the knower is identified with the self and the thing known with a material thing, or the knower with the mind and the thing known with an idea or collection of sense-data, or the knower with the knowing “subject” and the thing known with the “object”, is not important. Dewey’s contention is that no matter how one characterizes the spectator and the thing known, this conception of knowing is fundamentally mistaken, mythological. He collectively dubs all theories which share it “The Spectator Theory of Knowledge”. This common label reflects the fact that for Dewey theories as different as direct realism and epistemological dualism, British empiricism and continental rationalism, are simply variations on the same unlikely theme.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy  General Interest  Philosophy of Mind  Philosophy of Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0026-9662
DOI monist19735723
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,268
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Knowing and 'Coming-to-Know' in Dewey's Theory of Knowledge.Georges Dicker - 1969 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Dewey and Russell on the Possibility of Immediate Knowledge.Tom Burke - 1998 - Studies in Philosophy and Education 17 (2/3):149-153.
Dewey's Theory of Knowing.Georges Dicker - 1976 - University City Science Center.
Knowing and the Known.John Dewey - 1950 - Greenwood Press.
Knowing.Michael David Roth - 1970 - New York: Random House.
Knowing That, Knowing How, and Knowing to Do.Refeng Tang - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (3):426-442.
Georges Dicker, "Dewey's Theory of Knowing". [REVIEW]Robert G. Meyers - 1978 - Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 14 (1):77.
John Dewey Reconsidered.R. S. Peters (ed.) - 1977 - Routledge and Kegan Paul.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2011-01-09

Total views
54 ( #170,671 of 2,325,507 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #664,323 of 2,325,507 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes