Kant, Mothersill and principles of taste


Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/431137
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,711
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Acquired Taste.Kevin Melchionne - 2007 - Contemporary Aesthetics.
James Shelley on Critical Principles.George Dickie - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):57-64.
In Defense of Hume and the Causal Theory of Taste.Mary Mothersill - 1997 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 55 (3):312-317.
The Role of Symbolic Presentation in Kant's Theory of Taste.Alexander Rueger & Sahan Evren - 2005 - British Journal of Aesthetics 45 (3):229-247.
Kant's Theory of Judgment, and Judgments of Taste: On Henry Allison's "Kant's Theory of Taste".Béatrice Longuenesse - 2003 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 46 (2):143 – 163.
Hume's Principles of Taste: A Reply to Dickie.James Shelley - 2004 - British Journal of Aesthetics 44 (1):84-89.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
56 ( #131,919 of 2,328,391 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #548,982 of 2,328,391 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature