Regularity, Conditionality, and Asymmetry in Causation

The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 7:129-138 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX


In this paper I explore the relationship between the “Humean” regularity view of causation, the view that a cause is a necessary condition of its effect, and the asymmetry of causation—the principle that if an event e1 causes e2, then it is false that e2 causes e1. I argue that the regularity view, in combination with the view that a cause is a necessary condition of its effect, is inconsistent with the asymmetry of causation, and that the inconsistency can be removed by a modification of the view that a cause is a necessary condition of its effect that captures what is plausible in that view. I defend Hume, then, against the objection that he cannot accommodate a cause as being a necessary condition of its effect without absurdly denying the asymmetry of causation. This is only a limited defense, though, for I do not address the issue on which the tenability of the regularity view ultimately depends: viz., whether it can distinguish between causal laws and accidental generalizations without appealing to natural necessity



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 76,400

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles


Added to PP

54 (#220,350)

6 months
1 (#452,962)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Georges Dicker
State University of New York (SUNY)

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references