Hume Studies 33 (1):115-153 (2007)

Authors
Georges Dicker
State University of New York (SUNY)
Abstract
Why does Hume think that the “distinct existence” of sensible objects implies their “continu’d existence”? Does Hume have any reason for thinking that objects have an intermittent existence, other than that they lack a “distinct” existence? Why does Hume think that the inference from the “coherence” of our impressions to the continued existence of objects is “at bottom” considerably different from causal reasoning? The answers proposed are, respectively, that perceptually delimited objects would for Hume be causally dependent on being perceived; that Hume’s collapse of the object/perception distinction leads him to the view that objects have as “gappy” an existence as our perceptions of them, and that cases of coherence falsify the generalizations that would need to hold for inferences from coherence to qualify as causal reasoning
Keywords Hume
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0319-7336
DOI 10.1353/hms.2011.0259
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,268
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Vulgar Habits and Hume's Double Vision Argument.Annemarie Butler - 2010 - Journal of Scottish Philosophy 8 (2):169-187.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-03-18

Total views
45 ( #206,791 of 2,325,382 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #222,908 of 2,325,382 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes