Axiomathes 20 (2-3):269-277 (2010)

Contingencies in Nature may be explained, but such explanations refer to other contingencies (pt. I). Is there a way to “explain away” all contingencies? The first physical theory of modern times, Newton’s theory of gravitation, was received in a way that leaves this question open (pt. II), while Kepler’s theory of cosmological harmony arrived at a positive solution (pt. III). However, later developments in science outdated Kepler’s approach (pt. IV).
Keywords Contingent  Explanation  Law  Newton  Kepler
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10516-010-9103-2
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Genesis of the Concept of Physical Law.Edgar Zilsel - 1942 - Philosophical Review 51 (3):245-279.
Kepler¿s Harmonice Mundi: Dead End Road or Final Theory?Werner Diederich - 2001 - Diálogos. Revista de Filosofía de la Universidad de Puerto Rico 36 (78):7-18.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Philosophy of Science in Germany, 1992–2012: Survey-Based Overview and Quantitative Analysis.Matthias Unterhuber, Alexander Gebharter & Gerhard Schurz - 2014 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 45 (1):71-160.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
52 ( #207,033 of 2,455,617 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,617 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes