Collective Reasons and Agent-Relativity

Utilitas 34 (1):57-69 (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Could it be true that even though we as a group ought to do something, you as an individual ought not to do your part? And under what conditions, in particular, could this happen? In this article, I discuss how a certain kind of case, introduced by David Copp, illustrates the possibility that you ought not to do your part even when you would be playing a crucial causal role in the group action. This is because you may have special agent-relative reasons against participating that are not shared by the group as a whole. I defend the claim that these are indeed cases in which you ought not to do your part in what the group ought to do. I then argue that we can expect these cases to produce a troubling kind of rational conflict.

Similar books and articles

What We Together Ought to Do.Alexander Dietz - 2016 - Ethics 126 (4):955-982.
The Agent Relativity of Directed Reasons.Kenneth Shockley - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 10:391-400.
The Collectivity of Blaming.David Botting - 2016 - Kriterion - Journal of Philosophy 30 (3):1-39.
Altruism. [REVIEW]Eugene Heath - 1995 - Review of Metaphysics 48 (4):921-923.
The Intrapersonal Paradox of Deontology.Christa M. Johnson - 2019 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 16 (3):279-301.
Actions, beliefs, and consequences.David McCarthy - 1998 - Philosophical Studies 90 (1):57-77.
Are there any nonmotivating reasons for action?Noa Latham - 2003 - In Sven Walter & Heinz-Dieter Heckmann (eds.), Physicalism and Mental Causation. Imprint Academic. pp. 273.
An Anscombian approach to collective action.Ben Laurence - 2011 - In Anton Ford, Jennifer Hornsby & Frederick Stoutland (eds.), Essays on Anscombe's Intention. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Why Change the Subject? On Collective Epistemic Agency.András Szigeti - 2015 - Review of Philosophy and Psychology 6 (4):843-864.
Reasons, Values and Agent‐Relativity.R. Jay Wallace - 2010 - Dialectica 64 (4):503-528.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-24

Downloads
260 (#74,546)

6 months
122 (#28,072)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander Dietz
University of Southern California (PhD)

Citations of this work

Moral dilemmas.Terrance McConnell - 2010 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Collective Intentions and Actions.John Searle - 1990 - In Philip R. Cohen Jerry Morgan & Martha Pollack (eds.), Intentions in Communication. MIT Press. pp. 401-415.
Collective harm and the inefficacy problem.Julia Nefsky - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (4):e12587.
Should the numbers count?John Taurek - 1977 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 6 (4):293-316.
We-Intentions.Raimo Tuomela & Kaarlo Miller - 1988 - Philosophical Studies 53 (3):367-389.
Moral dilemmas and consistency.Ruth Barcan Marcus - 1980 - Journal of Philosophy 77 (3):121-136.

View all 21 references / Add more references