Doomsday--or: The dangers of statistics

Philosophical Quarterly 42 (166):78-84 (1992)
Authors
Dennis Dieks
Utrecht University
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2220450
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,905
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Blurring Out Cosmic Puzzles.Yann Benétreau-Dupin - 2015 - Philosophy of Science 82 (5):879–891.
The Doomsday Argument and the Number of Possible Observers.Ken D. Olum - 2002 - Philosophical Quarterly 52 (207):164-184.
The Doomsday Argument Without Knowledge of Birth Rank.Bradley Monton - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):79–82.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Philosophical Relevance of Statistics.Deborah G. Mayo - 1980 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1980:97 - 109.
A Note on the Doomsday Argument.Peter J. Lewis - 2010 - Analysis 70 (1):27-30.
Exploratory Statistics and Empiricism.Stanley A. Mulaik - 1985 - Philosophy of Science 52 (3):410-430.
The Doomsday Argument Without Knowledge of Birth Rank.Bradley Monton - 2003 - Philosophical Quarterly 53 (210):79–82.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
45 ( #143,712 of 2,293,878 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #108,420 of 2,293,878 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature