It does so: Review of The Mind Doesn't Work That Way: The Scope and Limits of Computational Psychology [Book Review]

AI Magazine 22 (4):141-144 (2001)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Objections to AI and computational cognitive science are myriad. Accordingly, there are many different reasons for these attacks. But all of them come down to one simple observation: humans seem a lot smarter that computers -- not just smarter as in Einstein was smarter than I, or I am smarter than a chimpanzee, but more like I am smarter than a pencil sharpener. To many, computation seems like the wrong paradigm for studying the mind. (Actually, I think there are deeper and darker reasons why AI, especially, is so often the brunt of polemics, see Dietrich, 2000.) But the truth is this: AI is making exciting progress, and will one day make a robot as intelligent as a person; indeed the robot will be conscious. And all this is because of another truth: the computational paradigm is the best thing to come down the pike since the wheel

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
11 (#1,113,583)

6 months
0

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric Dietrich
State University of New York at Binghamton

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references