Journal of Social Philosophy 51 (1):104-128 (2020)

Authors
Frank Dietrich
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf
Abstract
The child’s right to an open future aims at protecting the autonomy of the mature person into which a child will normally develop. The justification of state interventions into parental decisions which unduly restrict the options of the prospective adult has to address the problem that the value of autonomy is highly contested in modern pluralist societies. The article argues that the modern majority culture provides young adults with many more options than traditionalist religious communities. However, the options that can be chosen in faith groups, such as the Amish, do not constitute a subset of the options available in the wider society. Therefore, state policies which pursue the goal of providing every child with the greatest possible set of options cannot be based on a neutralist version of political liberalism. The advocates of a child’s right to an open future must rely on a perfectionist version of liberalism which draws on the ideal of leading an autonomous life. Since liberal perfectionism has problematic implications, the article defends a neutralist position that largely refrains from state interference with the educational authority of fundamentalist religious communities.
Keywords liberalism  neutrality  open future  autonomy  education  John Rawls  Joseph Raz  Jonathan Quong
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/josp.12273
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,342
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.C. L. Ten - 2003 - Mind 112 (447):563-566.
Political Liberalism by John Rawls. [REVIEW]Philip Pettit - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 91 (4):215-220.
The Morality of Freedom.Joseph Raz - 1986 - Philosophy 63 (243):119-122.

View all 22 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Foundation of the Child's Right to an Open Future.Joseph Millum - 2014 - Journal of Social Philosophy 45 (4):522-538.
Liberalism, Perfectionism, and Civic Virtue.Herlinde Pauer–Studer - 2001 - Philosophical Explorations 4 (3):174 – 192.
Defending Liberalism Against the Anomie Challenge.Andrew J. Cohen - 2004 - Social Theory and Practice 30 (3):391-427.
Three Concepts of Neutrality.Corrado Del Bò - 2009 - Rivista di Filosofia 100 (2):185-208.
Liberalism and Neutrality.Robert E. Goodin & Andrew Reeve - 1989 - In Robert E. Goodin & Andrew Reeve (eds.), Liberal Neutrality. Routledge.
Liberal Neutrality and Gender Justice.Emily McGill-Rutherford - 2017 - Social Philosophy Today 33:91-111.
Liberal Neutrality or Liberal Tolerance?Colin M. Macleod - 1997 - Law and Philosophy 16 (5):529 - 559.
Consumerism, the Procedural Republic, and the Unencumbered Self.Roger Paden - 1997 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 4 (1/2):33-40.
Four Versions of Liberalism.Beth Ann Rosenschein - 1988 - Dissertation, Stanford University
Political Liberalism and the False Neutrality Objection.Étienne Brown - 2018 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 1:1-20.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-03-16

Total views
22 ( #442,016 of 2,326,062 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #63,629 of 2,326,062 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes