Modeling for fairness: A Rawlsian approach


Authors
Sjoerd D. Zwart
Delft University of Technology
Abstract
In this paper we introduce the overlapping design consensus for the construction of models in design and the related value judgments. The overlapping design consensus is inspired by Rawls’ overlapping consensus. The overlapping design consensus is a well-informed, mutual agreement among all stakeholders based on fairness. Fairness is respected if all stakeholders’ interests are given due and equal attention. For reaching such fair agreement, we apply Rawls’ original position and reflective equilibrium to modeling. We argue that by striving for the original position, stakeholders expel invalid arguments, hierarchies, unwarranted beliefs, and bargaining effects from influencing the consensus. The reflective equilibrium requires that stakeholders’ beliefs cohere with the final agreement and its justification. Therefore, the overlapping design consensus is not only an agreement to decisions, as most other stakeholder approaches, it is also an agreement to their justification and that this justification is consistent with each stakeholders’ beliefs. For supporting fairness, we argue that fairness qualifies as a maxim in modeling. We furthermore distinguish values embedded in a model from values that are implied by its context of application. Finally, we conclude that for reaching an overlapping design consensus communication about properties of and values related to a model is required.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1016/j.shpsa.2013.11.001
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,373
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Justice as Fairness: A Restatement.C. L. Ten - 2001 - Mind 112 (447):563-566.
Inductive Risk and Values in Science.Heather Douglas - 2000 - Philosophy of Science 67 (4):559-579.
Epistemic Values and the Argument From Inductive Risk.Daniel Steel - 2010 - Philosophy of Science 77 (1):14-34.
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
Models in Science.Stephan Hartmann & Roman Frigg - 2006 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 2012.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Overlapping Consensus.Nebojša Zelić - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (1):101-115.
Overlapping Consensus: Objectivizing a Subjective Standpoint.Remi Odedoyin - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:323-343.
The Justification of Political Liberalism.Daniel M. Weinstock - 1994 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 75 (3-4):165-185.
Overlapping Consensus.Remi Odedoyin - 2000 - Journal of Philosophical Research 25:323-343.
“Overlapping Consensus” on “Overlapping Consensus”.Tong Shijun - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (Supplement):29-45.
The Non-Modularity of Moral Knowledge.Theresa Waynand Tobin - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:33-50.
The Non-Modularity of Moral Knowledge.Theresa Waynand Tobin - 2005 - Social Philosophy Today 21:33-50.
A justificação Por consenso sobreposto em John Rawls.Denis Coitinho Silveira - 2007 - Philósophos - Revista de Filosofia 12 (1).

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-01-27

Total views
17 ( #534,469 of 2,286,174 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #842,961 of 2,286,174 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature