Theoria 9 (2):193-202 (1994)
Abstract |
In this note I discuss some topics recently analysed by C.U. Moulines in Pluralidad y recursión showing the interest of Frege’s ontosemantic theory for the study of scientific theories. I point out some misunderstandings in making use of fregean view by clarifying the basic notions of objectivity, sense, reference, concept, and object. It is not my aim here to solve the difficulties arising the possibility of identifying two theories as one. Nevertheless, I ofter some clues to achieve such an identity theory that stricto sensu would be an equivalence theory
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
DOI | theoria1994928 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Sobre Las Posibilidades de Una Equivalencia Para El Fundamento de la Aritmética.Carlos Álvarez - 1987 - Theoria 2 (2):345-364.
Sobre la Teoría Fregeana de Las Oraciones No Extensionales (on Frege's Theory of Non-Extensional Sentences).Matthias Schirn - 1999 - Theoria 14 (1):131-156.
Un Análisis Dei Concepto de Cognoscibilidad Desde la Semántica de Mundos Posibles (an Analysis of the Notion of Knowability in the F Ield of Possible Worlds Semantics).Javier Vilanova - 1999 - Theoria 14 (3):413-429.
Los Conceptos abierLos Y la Paradoja Del Análisis (Open Concepts and the Paradox of Analysis).Sílvio Pinto - 2005 - Theoria 20 (2):199-219.
Justificación, Causalidad Y Acción Intencional (Justification, Causality and Intentional Action).Carlos J. Moya - 1998 - Theoria 13 (2):349-365.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2009-01-28
Total views
31 ( #333,466 of 2,411,338 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,938 of 2,411,338 )
2009-01-28
Total views
31 ( #333,466 of 2,411,338 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #538,938 of 2,411,338 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads