Foundations of Physics 19 (11):1397-1423 (1989)

Authors
Dennis Dieks
Utrecht University
Abstract
It is widely held that quantum mechanics is the first scientific theory to present scientifically internal, fundamental difficulties for a realistic interpretation (in the philosophical sense). The standard (Copenhagen) interpretation of the quantum theory is often described as the inevitable instrumentalistic response. It is the purpose of the present article to argue that quantum theory doesnot present fundamental new problems to a realistic interpretation. The formalism of quantum theory has the same states—it will be argued—as the formalisms of older physical theories and is capable of the same kinds of philosophical interpretation. This result is reached via an analysis of what it means to give a realistic interpretation to a theory. The main point of difference between quantum mechanics and other theories—as far as the possibilities of interpretation are concerned—is the special treatment given tomeasurement by the “projection postulate.” But it is possible to do without this postulate. Moreover, rejection of the projection postulate does not, in spite of what is often maintained in the literature, automatically lead to the many-worlds interpretation of quantum mechanics. A realistic interpretation is possible in which only the reality ofone (our) world is recognized. It is argued that the Copenhagen interpretation as expounded by Bohr is not in conflict with the here proposed realistic interpretation of quantum theory
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00732760
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,786
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Experimental Approaches to the Quantum Measurement Paradox.A. J. Leggett - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (9):939-952.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Olimpia Lombardi & Dennis Dieks - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Between Classical and Quantum.Nicolaas P. Landsman - 2007 - Handbook of the Philosophy of Science 2:417--553.
Time, Quantum Mechanics, and Decoherence.Simon Saunders - 1995 - Synthese 102 (2):235 - 266.
Interpreting the Modal Kochen–Specker Theorem: Possibility and Many Worlds in Quantum Mechanics.Christian de Ronde, Hector Freytes & Graciela Domenech - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 45:11-18.
Probability in Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Dennis Dieks - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (2):292-310.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Views of an Objective Quantum Theory.Yehudah Freundlich - 1977 - Foundations of Physics 7 (3-4):279-300.
Quantum-Realistic Interpretation.C. F. von Weizsäcker & Th Görnitz - 1991 - Foundations of Physics 21 (3):311-321.
Quantum Logic, Conditional Probability, and Interference.Jeffrey Bub - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):402-421.
“Ist Die Quantenphysik Vollständig?”.Holm Tetens - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):96-118.
Formalism and Interpretation in Quantum Theory.Alexander Wilce - 2010 - Foundations of Physics 40 (4):434-462.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
24 ( #440,424 of 2,425,461 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #150,853 of 2,425,461 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes