The Socratic method in teaching medical ethics: Potentials and limitations

The Socratic method has a long history in teaching philosophy and mathematics, marked by such names as Karl Weierstra, Leonard Nelson and Gustav Heckmann. Its basic idea is to encourage the participants of a learning group (of pupils, students, or practitioners) to work on a conceptual, ethical or psychological problem by their own collective intellectual effort, without a textual basis and without substantial help from the teacher whose part it is mainly to enforce the rigid procedural rules designed to ensure a fruitful, diversified, open and consensus-oriented thought process. Several features of the Socratic procedure, especially in the canonical form given to it by Heckmann, are highly attractive for the teaching of medical ethics in small groups: the strategy of starting from relevant singular individual experiences, interpreting and cautiously generalizing them in a process of inter-subjective confrontation and confirmation, the duty of non-directivity on the part of the teacher in regard to the contents of the discussion, the necessity, on the part of the participants, to make explicit both their own thinking and the way they understand the thought of others, the strict separation of content level and meta level discussion and, not least, the wise use made of the emotional and motivational resources developing in the group process. Experience shows, however, that the canonical form of the Socratic group suffers from a number of drawbacks which may be overcome by loosening the rigidity of some of the rules. These concern mainly the injunction against substantial interventions on the part of the teacher and the insistence on consensus formation rooted in Leonard Nelson's Neo-Kantian Apriorism
Keywords Socratic group work  Socratic method  teaching medical ethics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1009999523468
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,091
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Socratic Teaching Method.Mehul Shah - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (3):267-275.
Socratic Teaching: A Critical Assessment.Daniel Pekarsky - 1994 - Journal of Moral Education 23 (2):119-134.
Socratic Pedagogy: Perplexity, Humiliation, Shame and a Broken Egg.Peter Boghossian - 2011 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 44 (7):710-720.
Socratic Teaching.Carrie-Ann Biondi - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):119-140.
Socratic Teaching: Beyond the Paper Chase.Carrie-Ann Biondi - 2008 - Teaching Philosophy 31 (2):119-140.
The Ethics of Teaching Business Ethics.Bruce Macfarlane, Joe DesJardins & Diannah Lowry - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 1 (1):43-54.
On Being a Socratic Philosophy Instructor.Eric C. Mullis - 2009 - Teaching Philosophy 32 (4):345-359.
Essays on the Philosophy of Socrates.H. Benson Hugh (ed.) - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Socratic Dialogue as a Tool for Teaching Business Ethics.Kevin Morrell - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 53 (4):383-392.
Kierkegaard's Socratic Point of View.Paul Muench - 2007 - Kierkegaardiana 24:132-162.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

14 ( #317,185 of 2,132,834 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

4 ( #198,410 of 2,132,834 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums