The Ubiquity of Computation

Think (Defunct) 2 (June):27-29 (1993)
Abstract
For many years now, Harnad has argued that transduction is special among cognitive capacities -- special enough to block Searle's Chinese Room Argument. His arguments (as well as Searle's) have been important and useful, but not correct, it seems to me. Their arguments have provided the modern impetus for getting clear about computationalism and the nature of computing. This task has proven to be quite difficult. Which is simply to say that dealing with Harnad's arguments (as well as Searle's) has been difficult. Turing, it turns out, only got us started. But Harnad's (and Searle's) arguments ultimately fail. Turing, it turns out, was on the right track.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,162
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
What's Wrong and Right About Searle's Chinese Room Argument?Stevan Harnad - 2001 - In Michael A. Bishop & John M. Preston (eds.), [Book Chapter] (in Press). Oxford University Press.
Minds, Machines and Searle.Stevan Harnad - 1989 - Philosophical Explorations.
Minds, Machines and Searle.Stevan Harnad - 1989 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 1 (4):5-25.
Nixin' Goes to China.Larry Hauser - 2003 - In John M. Preston & John Mark Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press. pp. 123--143.
Intentionality and Computationalism: Minds, Machines, Searle and Harnad.Michael G. Dyer - 1990 - Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Artificial Intelligence 2:303-19.
Searle's Arguments Against Cognitive Science.Ned Block - 2003 - In John M. Preston & Michael A. Bishop (eds.), Views Into the Chinese Room: New Essays on Searle and Artificial Intelligence. Oxford University Press. pp. 70--79.
Rights and Wrongs of Searle's Chinese Room Argument.Stevan Harnad - 2001 - In M. Bishop & J. Preston (eds.), Essays on Searle's Chinese Room Argument. Oxford University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2010-12-22

Total downloads

25 ( #198,716 of 2,152,527 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #281,162 of 2,152,527 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums