What matters and how it matters: A choice-theoretic representation of moral theories
Philosophical Review 126 (4):421-479 (2017)
Abstract
We present a new “reason-based” approach to the formal representation of moral theories, drawing on recent decision-theoretic work. We show that any moral theory within a very large class can be represented in terms of two parameters: a specification of which properties of the objects of moral choice matter in any given context, and a specification of how these properties matter. Reason-based representations provide a very general taxonomy of moral theories, as differences among theories can be attributed to differences in their two key parameters. We can thus formalize several distinctions, such as between consequentialist and non-consequentialist theories, between universalist and relativist theories, between agent-neutral and agent-relative theories, between monistic and pluralistic theories, between atomistic and holistic theories, and between theories with a teleological structure and those without. Reason-based representations also shed light on an important but under-appreciated phenomenon: the “underdetermination of moral theory by deontic content”.Author Profiles
DOI
10.1215/00318108-4173412
My notes
Similar books and articles
Act and value: Expectation and the representability of moral theories.Graham Oddie & Peter Milne - 1991 - Theoria 57 (1-2):42-76.
Does Fish Welfare Matter? On the Moral Relevance of Agency.Frederike Kaldewaij - 2013 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 26 (1):63-74.
How to teach moral theories in applied ethics.B. Saunders - 2010 - Journal of Medical Ethics 36 (10):635-638.
In defense of the jurisdiction theory of rights.Eric Mack - 2000 - The Journal of Ethics 4 (1-2):71-98.
Moral Conflicts and Moral Psychology.Alastair James Norcross - 1991 - Dissertation, Syracuse University
Held's Experiential Method of Moral Inquiry: Some Questions.Marilyn Friedman - 2010 - Public Affairs Quarterly 24 (3):209-228.
Evagrius Ponticus on Being Good in God and Christ.Julia Konstantinovsky - 2013 - Studies in Christian Ethics 26 (3):317-332.
Reconciling feminist politics and feminist ethics on the issue of rights.Samantha Brennan - 1999 - Journal of Social Philosophy 30 (2):260–275.
Analytics
Added to PP
2017-05-03
Downloads
859 (#9,242)
6 months
137 (#4,951)
2017-05-03
Downloads
859 (#9,242)
6 months
137 (#4,951)
Historical graph of downloads
Author Profiles
Citations of this work
Decision under normative uncertainty.Franz Dietrich & Brian Jabarian - 2022 - Economics and Philosophy 38 (3):372-394.
Hyperintensionality and Normativity.Federico L. G. Faroldi - 2019 - Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag.
Consequentializing and Underdetermination.Marius Baumann - 2019 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 97 (3):511-527.