What We Together Ought to Do

Ethics 126 (4):955-982 (2016)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that we have not only individual reasons for action but also collective reasons for action: reasons which apply to us as a group. I next argue that if we together have a reason to act, then I may have a reason to do my part, but only when others will do theirs. Finally, I argue that collective reasons to do good can never make a difference to what individuals ought to do, but that other kinds of collective reasons can.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 100,941

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Distributing Collective Obligation.Sean Aas - 2015 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 9 (3):1-23.
Reasons, Determinism and the Ability to Do otherwise.Sofia Jeppsson - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (5):1225-1240.
How Do Reasons Accrue?Shyam Nair - 2016 - In Errol Lord & Barry Maguire (eds.), Weighing Reasons. New York, NY: Oxford University Press USA. pp. 56–73.
What is the point of helping?James Fanciullo - 2020 - Philosophical Studies 177 (6):1487-1500.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-04-05

Downloads
180 (#132,316)

6 months
20 (#141,772)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Alexander Dietz
University of Southern California (PhD)

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references