Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):163-169 (2012)
In this comment on Firestone and Jacobs’s book, In Defense of Kant’s Religion, I take issue with (1) the authors’ strategy in demonstrating that it is possible to positively incorporate religion and theology into Kant’s critical corpus, and (2) their intention to focus on the coherence of Kant’s theory without necessarily recommending it for Christianity. Regarding (1), I argue that in pursuing their strategy the authors ignore the fact that Kant has transposed what appear to be traditional religious doctrines to a completely different level of reflection, in effect turning them into imaginary tropes intended to mask otherwise irreducible contradictions in his view of human agency. As for (2), I claim that the authors’ intention runs the risk of being disingenuous, since Kant presented his religion as the true religion, opposing it to historical Christianity (unless the latter, of course, is re-interpreted according to his own precepts).
|Keywords||Contemporary Philosophy Philosophy and Religion|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Review: Firestone, Chris L., and Jacobs, Nathan, In Defense of Kant's Religion. [REVIEW]Robert Gressis - 2009 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 66 (3):167-171.
In Defense of Not Defending Kant's Religion.Gordon E. Michalson - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):181-192.
A Response to Critics of In Defense of Kant's Religion.Chris L. Firestone - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):193-209.
A Reply to Critics of In Defense of Kant's Religion.Nathan A. Jacobs - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):210-228.
The Philosophical Significance of Kant's Religion.Pamela Sue Anderson - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):151-162.
Cross-Examination of In Defense of Kant's Religion.Stephen R. Palmquist - 2012 - Faith and Philosophy 29 (2):170-180.
Kant and Religion: Conflict or Compromise?Chris L. Firestone - 1999 - Religious Studies 35 (2):151-171.
Review: Firestone, Kant and Theology at the Boundaries of Reason. [REVIEW]Robert Gressis - 2010 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 67 (3):187-191.
Kant's Transcendental Religious Argument: The Possibility of Religion.Dennis Schulting - 2013 - In Stefano Bacin & Claudio La Rocca (eds.), Akten des XI. Kant-Kongresses 2010. de Gruyter. pp. 949-962.
The Devil, The Virgin, and the Envoy: Symbols of Moral Struggle in Religion II.2.Andrew Chignell - 2010 - In Otfried Hoeffe (ed.), Klassiker Auslegen: Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen. Akademie Verlag.
Added to index2012-09-18
Total downloads6 ( #550,860 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?