Neuroquantology 16 (4):26-33 (2018)
AbstractAlthough quantum mechanics can accurately predict the probability distribution of outcomes in an ensemble of identical systems, it cannot predict the result of an individual system. All the local and global hidden variable theories attempting to explain individual behavior have been proved invalid by experiments (violation of Bell’s inequality) and theory. As an alternative, Schrodinger and others have hypothesized existence of free will in every particle which causes randomness in individual results. However, these free will theories have failed to quantitatively explain the quantum mechanical results. In this paper, we take the clue from quantum biology to get the explanation of quantum mechanical distribution. Recently it was reported that mutations (which are quantum processes) in DNA of E. coli bacteria instead of being random were biased in a direction such that the chance of survival of the bacteria is increased. Extrapolating it, we assume that all the particles including inanimate fundamental particles have a will and that is biased to satisfy the collective goals of the ensemble. Using this postulate, we mathematically derive the correct spin probability distribution without using quantum mechanical formalism (operators and Born’s rule) and exactly reproduce the quantum mechanical spin correlation in entangled pairs. Using our concept, we also mathematically derive the form of quantum mechanical wave function of free particle which is conventionally a postulate of quantum mechanics. Thus, we prove that the origin of quantum mechanical results lies in the will (or consciousness) of the objects biased by the collective goal of ensemble or universe. This biasing by the group on individuals can be called as “coherence” which directly represents the extent of life present in the ensemble. So, we can say that life originates out of establishment of coherence in a group of inanimate particles.
Similar books and articles
A quantum mechanical version of the paper by E. Schrödinger “Über die Umkehrung der Naturgesetze”.Otto Bergmann - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (3):373-378.
Thinking outside the box: The essence and implications of quantum entanglement.Huping Hu & Maoxin Wu - 2005
Quantum Mechanics Without Probabilities.Peter Mittelstaedt - 2001 - Vienna Circle Institute Yearbook 8:189-200.
Statistics, Symmetry, and the Conventionality of Indistinguishability in Quantum Mechanics.Darrin W. Belousek - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (1):1-34.
Manifestation of Quantum Mechanical Properties of a Proprietor’s Consciousness in Slit Measurements of Economic Systems.Sergiy Melnyk & Igor Tuluzov - 2014 - Neuroquantology 12 (3).
Quantum mechanics is about quantum information.Jeffrey Bub - 2005 - Foundations of Physics 35 (4):541-560.
Explanation, Emergence, and Quantum Entanglement.Andreas Hüttemann - 2005 - Philosophy of Science 72 (1):114-127.
Quantum Mechanics and the Nature of Reality.Thomas Greenlee - 2010 - In Science and Religion in Dialogue. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 97--104.
Three-space from quantum mechanics.G. F. Chew & H. P. Stapp - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (8):809-831.
Quantum Mechanics is Incomplete but it is Consistent with Locality.H. S. Perlman - 2017 - Foundations of Physics 47 (10):1309-1316.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
A model for the solution of the quantum measurement problem.Biswaranjan Dikshit - 2019 - Science and Philosophy 7 (2):59-70.
References found in this work
Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete?Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky & Nathan Rosen - 1935 - Physical Review (47):777-780.
Nonlocal Hidden-Variable Theories and Quantum Mechanics: An Incompatibility Theorem. [REVIEW]A. J. Leggett - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (10):1469-1493.