Ariadne revisited

ABSTRACT My article, "Ariadne at the Movies," provided a detailed, double film counter-example to the claim that films are types. Here I defend my views against various criticisms provided by Aaron Smuts. The defense includes some necessary clarification of the Ariadne article's broader theoretical structure and background, as well as some additional anti-type arguments to further withstand his criticisms.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
In Support of Content Theories of Art.John Dilworth - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):19 – 39.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Source of Titian's Bacchus and Ariadne.Angus Easson - 1969 - Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes 32:396-397.
Ariadne's Mitra: A Note on Catullus 64.61–4.Gail Tatham - 1990 - Classical Quarterly 40 (02):560-.
Ariadne at the Movies.John Dilworth - 2003 - Contemporary Aesthetics 1 (1).
Added to PP index

Total downloads
93 ( #61,241 of 2,214,632 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #40,326 of 2,214,632 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature