Evandro Agazzi: Right, Wrong and Science: The Ethical Dimensions of the Techno-Scientific Enterprise
Craig Dilworth (ed.)
Rodopi (2004)
Abstract |
Solving the problem of the negative impact of science and technology on society and the environment is indeed the greatest challenge of our time. To date, this challenge has been taken up by few professional philosophers of science, making this volume a welcome contribution to the general debate.Agazzi’s treatment involves viewing modern science and technology as each constituting systems. Against the background of this approach, he provides a penetrating analysis of science, technology and ethics, and their interrelations. Agazzi sees the solution to the problem as lying in the moral sphere and including a multilateral assumption of responsibility on the part of decision makers both within and outside of science
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Buy this book | $123.56 used (10% off) Amazon page |
ISBN(s) | 9789042009196 9042009195 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Charles Taylor. Contemporary Philosophy in Focus. By Ruth Abbey, Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004. Pp. Xi, 220. Right, Wrong and Science: The Ethical Dimensions of the Techno-Scientific Enterprise. Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities, Vol. 81. By Evandro Agazzi. Edited by Craig Dilworth. Atlantic Highlands. [REVIEW]By Eric B. Baum Cambridge - 2004 - Philosophical Review 113 (2).
Rethinking Philosophy of Science Today.Evandro Agazzi - 2012 - Journal of Philosophical Research 37 (Supplement):85-101.
Science and Ethics: The Axiological Contexts of Science.Evandro Agazzi & Fabio Minazzi (eds.) - 2008 - P.I.E. Peter Lang.
The Ties to Bind: Techno-Science, Ethics and Democracy.Fuyuki Kurasawa - 2004 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 30 (2):159-186.
AGAZZI, Evandro, Philosophie, science, métaphysiqueAGAZZI, Evandro, Philosophie, science, métaphysique.François Mottard - 1989 - Laval Théologique et Philosophique 45 (1):159-159.
Evandro Agazzi's Ethical Pragmatism of Science.Janos Boros - 2003 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 81 (1):279-283.
Operations and Constructions in Science: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the International Academy of the Philosophy of Science, Erlangen/Germany, 17-19 September 2004. [REVIEW]Evandro Agazzi & Christian Thiel (eds.) - 2006 - Universitätsbund Erlangen-Nürnberg.
Pourquoi une philosophie des sciences ne peut se réduire à une épistémologie des sciences.Evandro Agazzi - 2008 - In Evandro Agazzi & Fabio Minazzi (eds.), Science and Ethics: The Axiological Contexts of Science. P.I.E. Peter Lang. pp. 14--59.
Techno-Science and Religious Sin: Orthodox Theology and Heidegger.ron Kaldis - 2008 - Sophia 47 (2).
Evandro Agazzi, Le Bein, le Mal Et la Science.P. Gochet - forthcoming - Revue Internationale de Philosophie.
Science and Metaphysics Confronting Nature.Evandro Agazzi - 1977 - Dialectics and Humanism 4 (3):127-136.
Appearance M This List Does Not Preclude a Future Review of the Book. Where They Are Known Prices Are Either Given in $ US or in£ UK. Agazzi, E. And Cordero, A., Philosophy and the Origin and Evolution of the Universe, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1991, Pp. 466,£ 64.00 Agazzi, Evandro, The Problem of Reductiomsm in Science, Dordrecht, Netherlands, Klu. [REVIEW]Robert E. Alhnson, Julia Annas, John P. Anton, Preus Anthony, Nigel Ashford, Stephen Davies, Zev Bechler, Radu J. Bogdan & Stephen E. Braude - 1992 - Mind 101.
Meaning Between Sense and Reference: Impacts of Semiotics on Philosophy of Science.Evandro Agazzi - 2012 - Semiotica 2012 (188).
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-01-22
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
2015-01-22
Total views
0
Recent downloads (6 months)
0
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.