The Abstractness of Artworks and Its Implications for Aesthetics

Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66 (4):341-353 (2008)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Artworks have at least some necessary content properties, as do abstract entities such as propositions. But no concrete item, whether an object, event, process etc., could have any necessary content property. So no artwork could be identical with a concrete item. Hence artworks must be abstract. I also argue that artworks are only contingently connected with concrete items, just as propositions are only contingently linked to their linguistic tokens.

Similar books and articles

The propositional challenge to aesthetics.John Dilworth - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (2):115-144.
Musical Materialism.Chris Tillman - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (1):13-29.
In support of content theories of art.John Dilworth - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (1):19 – 39.
The Double Content of Art.John Dilworth - 2005 - Prometheus Books.
Pictorial orientation matters.John Dilworth - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (1):39-56.
The problem of non-perceptual art.James Shelley - 2003 - British Journal of Aesthetics 43 (4):363-378.
Categories and Comparisons of Artworks.H. J. Pratt - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):45-59.
Off the Beaten Path: The Artworks of Andrew Goldsworthy.Nicolas de Warren - 2007 - Environmental Philosophy 4 (1-2):29-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-05-14

Downloads
417 (#26,850)

6 months
63 (#19,466)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

John Dilworth
Western Michigan University

Citations of this work

More on the Interactive Indexing Semantic Theory.John Dilworth - 2010 - Minds and Machines 20 (3):455-474.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Global supervenience and dependence.Karen Bennett - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (3):501-529.

Add more references