Think 14 (40):101-107 (2015)

Authors
Abstract
This paper shows that a recent, simplified version of St. Anselm's proof of the existence of God has its flank open to Gaunilo's objection. Reformulating Anselm's line of reasoning in terms of the distinction between mediated and unmediated causal powers, as the simplified proof does, makes it harder for Anselm's supporters to refute the objection that the ontological argument absurdly entails the existence of all kinds of fictional entities
Keywords Anselm  Ontological Argument  Gaunilo  Gareth Matthews  Lynne Baker
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s1477175615000081
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,037
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Recent Objections of Ontological Arguments.Devonte Narde - 2020 - Quaerens Deum: The Liberty Undergraduate Journal for Philosophy of Religion 5 (1).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-04-09

Total views
74 ( #146,389 of 2,454,418 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,749 of 2,454,418 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes