Braga: Axioma - Publicações da Faculdade de Filosofia (2017)

Authors
Ricardo Barroso
Universidade Católica Portuguesa
Abstract
This study aims to contribute to the research in the history of science, specifically, in the area of the seventeenth century cosmology, which had in Riccioli, a contemporary of Galileo, an undeniable protagonist. In many histories of science, Giovanni Battista Riccioli (1598-1671) is either omitted or mentioned only briefly in relation to his main cosmological work, the Almagestum Novum (1651), which is generally taken as little more than a source of useful information. When it comes to evaluating Riccioli’s philosophical views or his contribution to the development of modern science, especially in observational astronomy, contrasting opinions have been expressed. Several scholars believed especially in the past, but some still in the present, that although during the dispute over Copernicanism Riccioli was personally convinced that the official positions of Catholic theologians were untenable, he kept his own views private, and mentioned in his works only official opinions, as if he fully agreed with them. Depicted as “a spokesman for the Society of Jesus” who was asked by his superiors to uphold a lost cause, Riccioli has been accused of behaving like a bad advocate, one who acted by commission, rather than by conviction, and who did not make a real effort to argue convincingly against the Copernican views. Since no comprehensive and contextual study of Riccioli’s cosmological views has ever been carried out, references to his thought are often put forward out of perspective. The present study attempts thus to achieve a more complete view, and sets out to illustrate the context of Riccioli’s work in the Society of Jesus, and more generally within the seventeenth century research and debate on cosmology.
Keywords Cosmology  History of Science  Giovanni Battista Riccioli  Philosophy of Science  Philosophy of Nature  Seventeenth century cosmology
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
ISBN(s) 9726972825
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 59,735
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Giovanni Battista Riccioli, critico de Galileu.A. Dinis - 1998 - Revista Portuguesa de Filosofia 54 (2):163-193.
Picturing the Moon: Hevelius’s and Riccioli’s Visual Debate.Janet Vertesi - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38 (2):401-421.
Cosmology, Particles, and the Unity of Science.Henrik Zinkernagel - 2001 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 33 (3):493-516.
The Peculiar Status of Cosmology As a Science.Jan Such - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:73-80.
Sociology of Modern Cosmology.Martín López Corredoira - 2009 - In J. A. Rubiño-Martín, J. A. Belmonte, F. Prada & A. Alberdi (eds.), Cosmology across Cultures. Astronomical Society of Pacific. pp. 66-73.
Non-Standard Models and the Sociology of Cosmology.Martín López-Corredoira - 2014 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 46 (1):86-96.
The Peculiar Status of Cosmology As a Science.Jan Such - 2007 - The Proceedings of the Twenty-First World Congress of Philosophy 5:73-80.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-07-21

Total views
15 ( #660,041 of 2,432,439 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #465,713 of 2,432,439 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes