On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate

Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):651-652 (2009)
Abstract
In a previous paper, I had argued that Strong’s counterexamples to Marquis’s argument against abortion—according to which terminating fetuses is wrong because it deprives them of a valuable future—fail either because they have no bearing on Marquis’s argument or because they make unacceptable claims about what constitutes a valuable future. In this paper I respond to Strong’s criticism of my argument according to which I fail to acknowledge that Marquis uses "future like ours" and "valuable future" interchangeably. I show that my argument does not rely on not acknowledging that "future like ours" and "valuable future" are interchangeable; and that, rather, it is exactly by replacing "future like ours" with "valuable future" that I construct my argument against Strong. I conclude with some remarks on how Marquis’s concept of "future like ours" should be interpreted.
Keywords abortion  Marquis  future like ours
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2009.031294
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 32,696
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Embryo Loss and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):537-540.
Fathers and Abortion.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (4):444-458.
Withdrawing Artificial Nutrition and Patients' Interests.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):555-556.
Broadening the Future of Value Account of the Wrongness of Killing.Ezio Di Nucci - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4):587-590.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Natural Response to Boonin.Andrew J. Peach - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):357-376.
Why I Was Never a Zygote.Robert Lane - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):63-83.
Abortion, Persons, and Futures of Value.Donald Wilson - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):86-97.
Abortion, Time-Relative Interests, and Futures Like Ours.Peter Nichols - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):493-506.
Abortion, Competing Entitlements, and Parental Responsibility.Alex Rajczi - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):379-395.
Abortion: Strong's Counterexamples Fail.Ezio Di Nucci - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):304-305.
A Critique of “the Best Secular Argument Against Abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Reply to Di Nucci: Why the Counterexamples Succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.
Added to PP index
2009-10-01

Total downloads
164 ( #33,319 of 2,237,425 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #184,249 of 2,237,425 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature