On how to interpret the role of the future within the abortion debate

Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (10):651-652 (2009)
Authors
Ezio Di Nucci
University of Copenhagen
Abstract
In a previous paper, I had argued that Strong’s counterexamples to Marquis’s argument against abortion—according to which terminating fetuses is wrong because it deprives them of a valuable future—fail either because they have no bearing on Marquis’s argument or because they make unacceptable claims about what constitutes a valuable future. In this paper I respond to Strong’s criticism of my argument according to which I fail to acknowledge that Marquis uses "future like ours" and "valuable future" interchangeably. I show that my argument does not rely on not acknowledging that "future like ours" and "valuable future" are interchangeable; and that, rather, it is exactly by replacing "future like ours" with "valuable future" that I construct my argument against Strong. I conclude with some remarks on how Marquis’s concept of "future like ours" should be interpreted.
Keywords abortion  Marquis  future like ours
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/jme.2009.031294
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,425
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Embryo Loss and Double Effect.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (8):537-540.
Fathers and Abortion.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 39 (4):444-458.
Withdrawing Artificial Nutrition and Patients' Interests.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):555-556.
Broadening the Future of Value Account of the Wrongness of Killing.Ezio Di Nucci - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4):587-590.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Natural Response to Boonin.Andrew J. Peach - 2005 - International Philosophical Quarterly 45 (3):357-376.
Why I Was Never a Zygote.Robert Lane - 2003 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 41 (1):63-83.
Abortion, Persons, and Futures of Value.Donald Wilson - 2007 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 14 (2):86-97.
Abortion, Time-Relative Interests, and Futures Like Ours.Peter Nichols - 2012 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 15 (4):493-506.
Abortion, Competing Entitlements, and Parental Responsibility.Alex Rajczi - 2009 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 26 (4):379-395.
Abortion: Strong's Counterexamples Fail.Ezio Di Nucci - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):304-305.
A Critique of “the Best Secular Argument Against Abortion”.C. Strong - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (10):727-731.
Reply to Di Nucci: Why the Counterexamples Succeed.C. Strong - 2009 - Journal of Medical Ethics 35 (5):326-327.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-10-01

Total downloads
167 ( #33,939 of 2,267,138 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #66,722 of 2,267,138 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature