Public Opinion on Cognitive Enhancement Varies across Different Situations

American Journal of Bioethics Neuroscience 11 (4):224-237 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 89,718

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Cognitive Enhancement: Methods, Ethics, Regulatory Challenges. [REVIEW]Nick Bostrom - 2009 - Science and Engineering Ethics 15 (3):311-341.
The ethics of cognitive enhancement: Flynn effect and the natural talents fallacy.Marcelo de Araujo - 2017 - Ethic@: An International Journal for Moral Philosophy 16 (1):01–14.
The perils of moral enhancement.Aleksandar Dobrijevic - 2012 - Filozofija I Društvo 23 (2):104-110.
Neuroenhancing Public Health.David Shaw - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics (6):2012-101300.
Cognitive extension, enhancement, and the phenomenology of thinking.Philip J. Walsh - 2017 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 16 (1):33-51.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-11-17

Downloads
25 (#536,854)

6 months
11 (#126,821)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?