Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (9):555-556 (2013)

I argue that the arguments brought by Counsel for M to the English Court of Protection are morally problematic in prioritising subjective interests that are the result of ‘consistent autonomous thought’ over subjective interests that are the result of a more limited cognitive perspective
Keywords euthanasia  medical ethics  artificial nutrition  higher and lower pleasures
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2012-100856
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Animal Liberation.Peter Singer (ed.) - 1977 - Avon Books.
Utilitarianism.J. S. Mill - 1861 - Oxford University Press UK.
Utilitarianism.John Stuart Mill - 1863 - Cleveland: Cambridge University Press.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Broadening the Future of Value Account of the Wrongness of Killing.Ezio Di Nucci - 2015 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 18 (4):587-590.
Mindlessness Bibliography.Ezio Di Nucci - 2013 - Cambridge Scholars Press.
Analysing the Wrongness of Killing.Ezio Di Nucci - 2014 - Public Reason 6 (1-2).

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Withdrawing Artificial Ventilation.V. English - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (8):495-496.


Added to PP index

Total views
502 ( #16,144 of 2,462,519 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
44 ( #20,149 of 2,462,519 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes