A review and analysis of new Italian law 219/2017: ‘provisions for informed consent and advance directives treatment’

BMC Medical Ethics 20 (1):17 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In December 2017, Law 219/2017, ‘Provisions for informed consent and advance directives’, was approved in Italy. The law is the culmination of a year-long process and the subject of heated debate throughout Italian society. Contentious issues are addressed in the law. What emerges clearly are concepts such as quality of life, autonomy, and the right to accept or refuse any medical treatment – concepts that should be part of an optimal relationship between the patient and healthcare professionals. The law maximizes the value of the patient’s time to decide. Every patient is allowed to make choices for the present as well as for the future, conceived as a continuation of the present, and to decide what comes next, based on what he/she already knows. The law identifies three distinct but converging paths towards the affirmation of a care relationship based on reciprocal trust and respect: the possibility to consent to or refuse treatment, the shared care planning, and advance directives. The fundamental point to emerge from the new Italian law is that consensus is an essential connotation of the treatment relationship. Consensus is not limited to the acceptance/rejection of medical treatment but is ongoing. It is projected into the future through shared care planning and advance directives which act as tools for self-determination and the manifestation of the beliefs and preferences of persons unable to express their will. These principles are in line with the idea of appropriate care as evaluated from two different perspectives, one of scientific adequacy and the other commensurate with the individual’s resources, fragility, values, and beliefs. Surely, however, the new law is not the end of the matter on issues such as conscientious objection, which is deeply rooted within the Italian cultural and political debate. In this regard, healthcare institutions and policymakers will be called upon to develop and implement organizational policies aimed at the management of foreseeable conscientious objection in this field.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Advance Directives and the Problem of Informed Consent.Marcia Sokolowski - 2010 - Journal of Ethics in Mental Health 5:1-6.
A direct advance on advance directives.David Shaw - 2012 - Bioethics 26 (5):267-274.
Advance Research Directives in Germany: A Proposal for a Disclosure Standard.Matthé Scholten - 2018 - GeroPsych: The Journal of Gerontopsychology and Geriatric Psychiatry 31 (2):77-86.
The Informed Consent Process in Obstetrics.Maurice James Mueller - 1996 - Dissertation, The Union Institute
Descendants and advance directives.Christopher Buford - 2014 - Monash Bioethics Review 32 (3-4):217-231.

Analytics

Added to PP
2019-03-05

Downloads
21 (#718,251)

6 months
7 (#411,886)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile