Set—Theoretical Representations of Ordered Pairs and Their Adequacy for the Logic of Relations

Canadian Journal of Philosophy 12 (2):353 - 374 (1982)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One of the most significant discoveries of early twentieth century mathematical logic was a workable definition of ‘ordered pair’ totally within set theory. Norbert Wiener, and independently Casimir Kuratowski, are usually credited with this discovery. A definition of ‘ordered pair’ held the key to the precise formulation of the notions of ‘relation’ and ‘function’ — both of which are probably indispensable for an understanding of the foundations of mathematics. The set-theoretic definition of ‘ordered pair’ thus turned out to be a key victory for logicism, providing one admits set theory is logic. The definition also was instrumental in achieving the appearance of ontological economy — since it seemed only sets were needed — although this feature was emphasized only later.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,386

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Reconsidering ordered pairs.Dana Scott & Dominic McCarty - 2008 - Bulletin of Symbolic Logic 14 (3):379-397.
On ordered pairs.W. V. Quine - 1945 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 10 (3):95-96.
Ordered pairs and cardinality in new foundations.John Lake - 1974 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 15 (3):481-484.
Theories of types and ordered pairs.John E. Cooley - 1975 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 16 (3):418-420.
Two consistency results on set mappings.Péter Komjáth & Saharon Shelah - 2000 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 65 (1):333-338.
Ordered sets R and Q as bases of Kripke models.Mitio Takano - 1987 - Studia Logica 46 (2):137 - 148.
The adequacy of language.David Harrah - 1960 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 3 (1-4):73 – 88.
On the relations between (neo-classical) philosophy of science and logic.Roberto Festa - 2005 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 83 (1):511-520.
Contradictions, Objects, and Belief.Srećko Kovač - 2007 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Alexandre Costa-Leite (eds.), Perspectives on Universal Logic. Monza: Polimetrica. pp. 417-434.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-05-29

Downloads
76 (#213,869)

6 months
6 (#504,917)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Randall Dipert
PhD: Indiana University, Bloomington; Last affiliation: University at Buffalo

Citations of this work

Peirce, frege, the logic of relations, and church's theorem.Randall R. Dipert - 1984 - History and Philosophy of Logic 5 (1):49-66.
Quine on explication and elimination.Martin Gustafsson - 2006 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36 (1):57-70.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Word and Object.Willard Van Orman Quine - 1960 - Les Etudes Philosophiques 17 (2):278-279.
What numbers could not be.Paul Benacerraf - 1965 - Philosophical Review 74 (1):47-73.
On the calculus of relations.Alfred Tarski - 1941 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 6 (3):73-89.
The plight of the platonist.Philip Kitcher - 1978 - Noûs 12 (2):119-136.
Plato's phaedo theory of relations.Héctor-Neri Castañeda - 1972 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 1 (3/4):467 - 480.

View all 9 references / Add more references