The inhumanity of cards against humanity

Think 17 (48):39-50 (2018)

Authors
Samuel Director
University of Colorado, Boulder
Abstract
In general, it is morally wrong to joke about the suffering of a category of people while in front of a person who fits into this category. I argue that, when people play the game Cards Against Humanity, it is likely that they do this very action. Thus, I conclude that it is morally wrong to play Cards Against Humanity.
Keywords Philosophy of humor  Cards Against Humanity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S1477175617000318
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 40,131
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Die Inhumanität des Animal Sociale. Vier Thesen zum interdisziplinären Beitrag der theologischen Anthropologie.Rebekka A. Klein - 2009 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 51 (4):427-444.
The Russian Cards Problem.Hans van Ditmarsch - 2003 - Studia Logica 75 (1):31-62.
Becoming Able to See Anomalies.Jennifer Clegg, Elizabeth Murphy & Kathryn Almack - 2017 - Philosophy, Psychiatry, and Psychology 24 (4):381-384.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-02-08

Total views
166 ( #41,247 of 2,237,228 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
22 ( #30,712 of 2,237,228 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature