Zur Epistemologie des Wunders: Swinburne versus Hume

In Ulrich L. Lehner & Ronald K. Tacelli (eds.), Wort und Wahrheit. Fragen der Erkenntnistheorie. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer. pp. 171-191 (2019)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The article deals with the question of the possibility of miracles opposing the theory of miracles of Richard Swinburne and David Hume.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,873

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Miracles and David Hume.Ninian Smart - 1969 - In Philosophers and religious truth. New York]: Macmillan. pp. ch. 2.
Hume’s Scale.Hendrik van der Breggen - 2002 - Philosophia Christi 4 (2):443 - 453.
Two Peas in a Single Polytheistic Pod: Richard Swinburne and John Hick.Daniel Howard-Snyder - 2016 - Journal of Philosophical Research 41 (Supplement):17-32.
What Swinburne should have concluded.Charles E. Gutenson - 1997 - Religious Studies 33 (3):243-247.
A New Interpretation of Hume's 'Of Miracles'.Chris Slupik - 1995 - Religious Studies 31 (4):517 - 536.
Hume's Fallacy.K. Rao - 1981 - Journal of Parapsychology 45.


Added to PP

48 (#339,190)

6 months
8 (#411,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jörg Disse
Theologische Fakultät Fulda, Germany

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references