Emotion Review 4 (4):387-388 (2012)

Abstract
The target articles and commentaries reveal considerable support for the view that the term “emotion” names neither a natural kind nor a coherent psychological category. This brief response revisits a couple of historical points about the meanings of “emotion,” as well as the ancient debate between Stoicism and Christianity
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1177/1754073912445826
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,348
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

“Emotion”: The History of a Keyword in Crisis.Thomas Dixon - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (4):1754073912445814.
The Invention of Altruism: Making Moral Meanings in Victorian Britain.Thomas Dixon - 2008 - Published for the British Academy by Oxford University Press.
The Role of Language in a Science of Emotion.Asifa Majid - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (4):380-381.

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Role of Language in a Science of Emotion.Asifa Majid - 2012 - Emotion Review 4 (4):380-381.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-02

Total views
20 ( #518,808 of 2,419,997 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #542,808 of 2,419,997 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes