Penetrating the Omerta of Predatory Publishing: The Romanian Connection

Science and Engineering Ethics 21 (1):183-202 (2015)

Not so long ago, a well institutionalized predatory journal exposed itself by publishing a hoax article that blew the whistle for its devastating influence on the academic affairs of a small country. This paper puts that experiment in context, gives all the important details and analyzes the results. The experiment was inspired by well-known cases of scientific activism and is in line with recent efforts against predatory publishers. The paper presents the evidence in detail and uses it to analyze the publishing practices of the offending journal, using established criteria for assessing predatory publications. That journal somehow acquired an impact factor and charged money to publish thousands of “scientific” papers without any peer review. Since the impact factor is the major official evaluation criteria for scientists in Serbia, these papers disturbed the whole academic evaluation process. Credentials acquired by those publications form a strong obstacle to institutionalized reasoned efforts against such practices. This case warns the whole community of the long lasting damage when journals with low publishing ethics are taken seriously
Keywords Predatory publishing  Whistleblowing  Scientific responsibility  Peer review  Publication practices  Professional competence
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-014-9521-4
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,373
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Linking Groupthink to Unethical Behavior in Organizations.Ronald R. Sims - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (9):651 - 662.
Transgressing the Boundaries: An Afterword.Alan D. Sokal - 1996 - Philosophy and Literature 20 (2):338-346.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Communication scientifique : pour le meilleur et le PEER.Laurent Romary - 2010 - Hermès: La Revue Cognition, communication, politique 57 (2):131.
The Importance of the Intent in Predatory Pricing Cases.Raimundas Moisejevas - 2010 - Jurisprudencija: Mokslo darbu žurnalas 122 (4):319-334.


Added to PP index

Total views
7 ( #934,547 of 2,286,137 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #838,750 of 2,286,137 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes

Sign in to use this feature