Different Kinds and Aspects of Bullshit

In Hardcastle Reisch (ed.), Bullshit and Philosophy. Chicago: Open Court (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper, we aim to show that there is a particular kind of bullshit that is not dealt with in Harry Frankfurt’s and G.A. Cohen’s critiques of bullshit. We also point out the evaluative complexity of bullshit. Frankfurt and Cohen both stress its negative and possibly destructive aspects, but one might wonder whether bullshit need always and necessarily be reprehensible. We will argue that there are positive or at least neutral aspects to some kinds of bullshit.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On Bullshit. [REVIEW]Petter Naessan - 2005 - Philosophy Now 53 (4):44-44.
Raising the tone: Definition, bullshit, and the definition of bullshit.Andrew Aberdein - 2006 - In G. Reisch & G. Hardcastle (eds.), Bullshit and Philosophy. Open Court. pp. 151-169.
On bullshit.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1986 - Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
On truth.Harry G. Frankfurt - 2006 - New York: Knopf.
Myself and "I".John Perry - 1998 - In Marcelo Stamm (ed.), Philosophie in Synthetischer Absicht. pp. 83--103.
Our vision and our mission: Bullshit, assertion and belief.Ben Kotzee - 2007 - South African Journal of Philosophy 26 (2):163-175.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-11-13

Downloads
710 (#24,155)

6 months
112 (#40,369)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Katrien Schaubroeck
University of Antwerp
Hans Maes
University of Kent

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Concealment and Exposure.Thomas Nagel - 1998 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1):3-30.

Add more references