Business and Professional Ethics Journal 30 (1):59-70 (2011)
A great deal has been written in recent years about the justification, if any, for the current levels of executive compensation. The folk consensus is that the current levels of executive compensation are unjustifiably high from both a moral and an economic perspective. In the case of the former, the compensation level is unfair and unjust. And in the case of the latter, the compensation level is not in the broader interests of other stakeholders or of firm-value maximization.In this paper I counter this folk wisdom. I argue that executive compensation is a facet of the Stockholder Model, in which the primary objective of the firm is taken to be the maximization of shareholder wealth, and as such any moral critique of executive compensation is by default a critique of the Stockholder Model. Thus a necessary and sufficient condition for a moral defense of executive compensation is a moral defense of the Stockholder Model. I provide such a defense. Once the Stockholder Model is accepted then any moral or economic defense of executive compensation rests on its compatibility with shareholder wealthmaximization. I argue that the current levels of executive compensation are consistent with the overarching corporate goal of shareholder wealth maximization. Thus the current levels of executive compensation are both morally and economically justified
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Business and Professional Ethics|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
A Model Capturing Ethics and Executive Compensation.Waymond Rodgers & Susana Gago - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 48 (2):189-202.
Executive Compensation and Earnings Persistence.Allan S. Ashley & Simon S. M. Yang - 2004 - Journal of Business Ethics 50 (4):369-382.
A Fair Wage? Capping Executive Compensation.Julian Friedland - 2010 - Journal of Business Ethics Education 7:129-139.
The Role of Ethics in Executive Compensation: Toward a Contractarian Interpretation of the Neoclassical Theory of Managerial Renumeration. [REVIEW]Linda L. Carr & Moosa Valinezhad - 1994 - Journal of Business Ethics 13 (2):81 - 93.
Merger and Acquisition Related Determinants of Executive Compensation Arrangements' Adoption.Virginia Bodolica, Michel Magnan & Martin Spraggon - 2007 - International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics 3 (4):407-429.
How Much Compensation Can CEOs Permissibly Accept?Jeffrey Moriarty - 2009 - Business Ethics Quarterly 19 (2):235-250.
Economic, Moral, and Motivational Criteria of Executive Compensation: Recent Developments.Lawrence A. Vitulano & S. J. Hannafey - 2009 - Open Ethics Journal 3 (2):67-70.
An Ethical Perspective on CEO Compensation.Mel Perel - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 48 (4):381-391.
Executive Compensation: Excessive or Equitable? [REVIEW]Donald Nichols & Chandra Subramaniam - 2001 - Journal of Business Ethics 29 (4):339 - 351.
Vice or Virtue? The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Executive Compensation.Ye Cai, Hoje Jo & Carrie Pan - 2011 - Journal of Business Ethics 104 (2):159-173.
Added to index2011-12-01
Total downloads42 ( #120,226 of 2,152,218 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #226,015 of 2,152,218 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.